A Rest Stop on the Road to the Future

The National Journal Transportation Expert Blog this week asked whether states should be allowed to commercialize rest stops.  I thought this was a timely question, and responded with the following:
 
The upcoming reauthorization will present an excellent opportunity for Congress to rethink its outdated blanket prohibition on the commercialization of state-owned safety rest stops.
This is no longer simply a question of who gets to sell fast food to weary travelers. The question is: how will we maintain our interstates to truly serve motorists’ changing needs at a time when increasing funding shortfalls and skyrocketing liability concerns are causing states to close existing rest areas in unprecedented numbers? 
A more nuanced balancing of interests seems overdue.

As just one example of how these rest stops might be valuably utilized without impinging on off-right of way private sector services, the Pacific Coast states (California, Oregon, and Washington) are trying to ensure the availability of alternative fuels along the I-5 corridor from British Columbia to Baja California, one of USDOT-designated critical “corridors of the future”. A backbone like this would serve to jumpstart the development of a wider distribution network essential to spur a wider acceptance of alternative fuels vehicles in passenger and freight fleets and consequently substantially reduce emissions. Private fuel distribution networks will be less likely to make this investment in advance of a large customer base demanding the service.

There are other examples of how the use of rest areas within the interstate system should be allowed, while at the same time protecting the many excellent and important businesses off-right of way currently serving the traveling public. It is increasingly clear that a black and white policy, based upon 1950’s definitions of commercial activity, no longer reflects an optimal transportation policy combination of technology. In key areas policy appears to be unnecessarily protecting businesses at the expense of innovative and integrated ideas for the future of our transportation infrastructure.

 

USDOT Outlines $600M "TIGER II" Grant Program, $150M Available for TIFIA

USDOT has published interim guidance on its new “TIGER II” competitive grant program, a $600M successor to the popular $1.5B TIGER program included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).  The guidance outlines application deadlines, eligibility and project selection criteria, and indicates a shift in the focus of the program from near-term job creation to long-term outcomes.  

TIGER II is not constrained by ARRA’s focus on “shovel ready” projects and immediate job creation (funds must be awarded by 9/30/2012, but there is no deadline for expenditure or project completion).  Instead, TIGER II seeks long-term outcomes, though these outcomes fall in the same general areas as TIGER I: safety, economic competitiveness, livability, sustainability, and state of good repair (the extent to which a project improves the condition of existing infrastructure and minimize life-cycle costs).

Click below for additional details about the focus and requirements of TIGER II.

Continue Reading...

Oberstar's Subcommittee Discusses P3s

Jeffrey Parker, President of Jeffrey A. Parker and Associates, has worked closely with Nossaman on several projects, including two recent projects in Florida.  We are pleased to include his comments here as a guest to Infra Insight.

The House Subcommittee on Highways and Transit invited me to participate in a hearing on April 14, 2010 on “Using Innovative Financing to Deliver Highway and Transit Projects.”  As a participant on the panel, I was pleased to share my firm’s experiences with availability payments and answer questions from the Subcommittee Members on the I-595 and Port of Miami Tunnel transactions.  My testimony is available online.  It was gratifying to see the subcommittee’s interest and the potential for these examples to help shape future federal policy. 

In addition to the P3 discussion, the Subcommittee demonstrated a strong interest in enlarging the current TIFIA loan program at USDOT, as well as in making railroad infrastructure loan financing (RRIF) more attractive. 

USDOT Chief Financial Officer Chris Bertram explained a number of concepts the Administration is developing for reauthorization of federal transportation programs, including the new national infrastructure loan and grant program.  Subcommittee members also sought feedback on the Federal Transit Administration’s “PentaP” Program and its impact on expediting the approval process for New Starts Projects.  Video of the entire hearing and a written summary are both available online.  

- Jeffrey Parker

The Future of Interstate Tolling

The IBTTA is discussing the future of tolling existing interstate capacity in light of the Federal Highway Administration’s decision to reject Pennsylvania’s application to toll Interstate 80.

My opinion?

The political barriers to tolling existing interstate capacity are just as real and monumental as raising the gas tax. In the short to mid term the more likely scenario is an acceleration of the trend to toll new capacity within existing interstate rights of way. The Ft. Lauderdale I-595, the Ft. Worth North Tarrant Express, and the Dallas I-635 are all recent examples of blending existing nontolled interstate upgrades with new tolled lanes. I project many more such projects which will benefit all concerned with less political friction. In reauthorizing the highway program Congress should follow the recommendations of the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission and give the states more leeway to utilize this tool.

You can see what others have to say about it at the ITBBA’s blog Tolling Points.

CTC Authorizes First Regional Design-Build Projects

On April 7, 2010, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) authorized the first two regional design-build projects under the state's innovative contracting authority under Senate Bill 4, SBX2 4. 

  • The ExpressLane Project is a joint state/local project of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Metro) and the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), which will be implemented by Caltrans.  The project will convert existing carpool lanes on Interstates 10 and 110 to high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes, or ExpressLanes.
     
  • The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project is a local transportation entity project slated for implementation by a regional entity.  It will widen State Route 91 with the addition of new freeway lanes, toll/express lanes, expanded freeway-to-freeway connectors and better access to and from the freeway at congested locations.

Other regional transportation agencies will no doubt be encouraged by the CTC’s unanimous approval of these two projects.

SBX2 4, which authorizes alternative contracting for certain projects was approved on February 20, 2009.  The CTC developed its related P3 policy guidance on October 14, 2009.